Newest Members
fyhbg, DEM, butalk, yangtalb, NatandJoeDoVegas
578 Registered Users
Forum Stats
578 Members
11 Forums
8385 Topics
64417 Posts

Max Online: 86 @ 10/22/11 10:54 PM
Who's Online
0 Registered (), 64 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
#63654 - 07/28/10 07:58 AM They Call It Something Else
will800 Offline
Member

Registered: 08/12/99
Posts: 1798
Loc: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

   They Call It Something Else
   They Call It Something Else
Somewhere in this desert town there has to be a legal description for the game of blackjack.

I think that that description would be in one or more of the Gaming Control files but I have yet to check that out due to way too many casino visits trying to find the game that is played in the same manner as originally played by the likes of Benny Binion, and Lefty, and Smugs, and Knuckles, etc., etc.

But somewhere in the recent past, some of these new town guys have been able to take the game of blackjack and change it to fit their needs which needs are noticeably adverse to the needs of their customers.

Just a few years back these 'changes' would have been considered ... Cheating!

But today these changes are the new way of doing business!

Here's what I'm getting at ........

I believe that somewhere in the original rules of blackjack there is a 'rule' that the casino must pay 3 to 2 for any player who gets a blackjack on their first two cards.

That means if you play a buck and get a blackjack, the casino owes you a buck and a half.

Or it you bet with a five dollar chip and get a blackjack, the casino owes you $7.50.

And a $10 bet would earn you $15 if you got a blackjack.

This is all very basic stuff ..... BUT I see a lot of people playing blackjack who have no idea what a blackjack payoff is supposed to be. They have no idea when I say 3 to 2? And they are perfectly satisfied when they get even money!

Pure stupidity! Pure stupidity! I gotta repeat .... Stupidity!

And those casinos who pay off a blackjack with even money always have an excuse .....

"You can place an additional side bet and get 3 to 1 of your first two cards equal 20."

"We give you 3 to 1 if you get three sevens!"

"You get a punch card if for every ten blackjacks you make within a 24 hours time frame!"

"We deal one deck!"

And on and on they go with lots of dumb excuses why they won't pay you what they should be paying you. (See above),

SO the way things are proceeding today ..... You blackjack players are paying the casino some of your own money every time you get a blackjack.

Yes! You are paying the casino when you get a blackjack if you are playing at any table that does not pay you 3 to 2 for a 21 on the first two cards.

If you are playing a dollar table and get a blackjack, they will pay you a dollar but they actually owe you $1.50. So they just made fifty cents.

If you are playing a five-dollar table and get a blackjack, they will pay you five-dollars but they actually owe you $7.50. So you just paid that casino $2.50.

So you end up paying fifty cents for every dollar you bet when you get a blackjack.

And the casinos appear to be getting away with this for two very simple reasons....

1. Blackjack players are very stupid gamblers.
2. The Gaming Commission appears to have no concern if the casino refers to it as something other than Blackjack even though it's actually blackjack. It appears that a 'side bet' option' on a blackjack table where gamblers are playing blackjack makes it something else other than blackjack'.

Ot maybe it's much more simpler ..... Maybe the original rules of the game never specified the pay-offs so the casinos can make their own rules and pay whatever they want to pay.

And the casinos have come to realize that the majority of today's blackjack players have no idea what a blackjack player received when he got a blackjack when blackjack was played in the manner in which it was originally intended.

REMEMBER THIS .... If you play blackjack at any table where a blackjack payoff is less than 3 - 2, you are paying the casino for your blackjack in addition to the normal house percentage.
_________________________
will800

Top
#63656 - 07/28/10 11:02 AM Re: They Call It Something Else [Re: will800]
JMT Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/01
Posts: 5945
Loc: Las Vegas NV , USA
Bob Stupak was the only person I know of to change the rules to such ridiculous standards. I suspect it's all legal if the rules are specified.

Nowadays, casinos aren't run by people. They are run by stockholders. Stockholders demand profits and don't care about customer satisfaction.

I would be on your bandwagon if that was the worst game in the casino. Perhaps you remember my rants on video poker paytables and the "gimmick games".

I wish I had an answer.

Top


Shout Box

Latest Posts
Lingerie Bowl IX
by Lee-PA
Yesterday at 05:25 AM
Whatever happened to . . . .
by JMT
02/05/12 11:12 AM
V The Ultimate Variety Show, V Theater
by JMT
02/04/12 04:11 AM
Super Bowl Prop Bets
by JMT
02/03/12 09:32 PM
Book Review
by Lee-PA
02/03/12 07:34 AM